Compare Rack::UTF8Sanitizer and Rack::ContentSecurityPolicy's popularity and activity
Popularity
3.9
Growing
Activity
5.7
-
Popularity
0.3
Stable
Activity
0.0
Stable
| Rack::UTF8Sanitizer | Rack::ContentSecurityPolicy | |
| 307 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 53 | 0 | |
| 82 days | 2 days | |
| almost 9 years ago | over 7 years ago | |
| 12 days ago | - | |
| - | L5 | |
| 203,493 | 50 | |
| Ruby | Ruby | |
| MIT License | MIT License | |
| Security, Rack, Middleware, Request Response Cycle, Sanitizer, Utf8, Encoding | Security, Rack, Content Security Policy, CSP, Middleware |
* Code Quality Rankings and insights are calculated and provided by Lumnify.
They vary from L1 to L5 with "L5" being the highest. Visit our partner's website for more details.
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
Interest over time of Rack::UTF8Sanitizer and Rack::ContentSecurityPolicy
Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs.
More comparisons
-
Rack::ContentSecurityPolicyvsSecureHeaders
-
Rack::ContentSecurityPolicyvsBrakeman
-
Rack::ContentSecurityPolicyvsMetasploit
-
Rack::ContentSecurityPolicyvsRack::JsonWebTokenAuth
-
Rack::ContentSecurityPolicyvsClamby
-
Rack::UTF8SanitizervsRack::Attack
Do not miss the trending Ruby projects and news
» Subscribe to our newsletter «
» Subscribe to our newsletter «